Beverly Hills Co-Ownership Disputes
Our team of partition attorneys in Los Angeles can assist co-owners with frequently asked questions about partitions, such as:
- What is recoverable in a partition action? “In a suit for partition it is a general rule that all equities and conflicting claims existing between the parties and arising out of their relation to the property to be partitioned may be adjusted.” Demetris v. Demetris (1954) 125 Cal. App. 2d 440. This means that co-owners can assert offsets or recover payments of the mortgage, taxes, insurance, repairs and improvements in excess of their fractional interests.
- When is a partition action right for my dispute? Generally, parties who can reach their own resolution of a co-ownership dispute are not reading websites about partition law. If you are reading this article, chances are that your co-ownership dispute has reached a level where legal options are being considered. Filing a partition action will bring about a certain result to the co-ownership dispute, rather than letting it linger for years on end. However, if the parties are very close to a settlement, it may be wise to consider a resolution.
- Do I need to go to court to win a partition action? While the partition action must be filed with the court, partition actions rarely involve a trial in which the co-owners appear at court. This means it is extremely unlikely that you will need to step foot in a courtroom. Most partition work is done by motion practice involving tentative rulings with little interaction between the court and the attorneys, let alone the co-owners.
- What types of properties can be subject to a partition action in California? All co-owned real or personal property can be partitioned under California law. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 872.020.
- Who pays for a partition action? In California, each party typically pays for their own attorney’s fees (known as the “American Rule”). However, California partition law allows for an exception to this rule, stating that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. Indeed, the court may award “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).
Our Beverly Hills Partition Attorneys Know Los Angeles County
Beverly Hills is a city located in Los Angeles County, California, United States. It is home to many celebrities, luxury shopping, and upscale restaurants. It is known for its beautiful homes, lush gardens, and tree-lined streets. Beverly Hills is also home to the famous Rodeo Drive, a shopping district filled with designer stores and high-end boutiques. The city is also home to many museums, galleries, and other cultural attractions. Beverly Hills is a popular tourist destination and is known for its luxurious lifestyle.
Beverly Hills, California was founded in 1914 by Burton E. Green, Charles E. Toberman, and William H. Wilcox. The city was named after Beverly Farms in Massachusetts and was incorporated in 1914. The city was initially developed as a residential area for the wealthy and was home to many celebrities and movie stars. Beverly Hills was the first city in the United States to have its own police and fire departments. In the 1920s, the city was home to many of the movie industry’s biggest stars, including Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and Rudolph Valentino. In the 1930s, Beverly Hills became a popular tourist destination, with the opening of the Beverly Hills Hotel and the Beverly Wilshire Hotel. The city also became known for its high-end shopping, with the opening of Rodeo Drive in the 1950s. Today, Beverly Hills is one of the most affluent cities in the United States and is home to many celebrities, luxury hotels, and high-end shopping. The city is also home to the famous Beverly Hills sign, which is located at the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Santa Monica Boulevard.
Schmidt v. Etter – Partition Action Case Study
In the legal case of Schmidt v. Etter, Not Reported in Cal.Rptr.2d (2002), the court was tasked with determining the validity of a partition agreement between two parties. The agreement stated that the parties would divide a parcel of land into two separate parcels, with each party receiving one parcel. The court found that the agreement was invalid because it did not provide for a method of partitioning the land. The court also found that the agreement did not provide for a method of determining the value of the land, nor did it provide for a method of determining the costs associated with the partition. Additionally, the court found that the agreement did not provide for a method of determining the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the partition. As a result, the court found that the agreement was invalid and unenforceable.
Contact an Experienced Partition Attorney in Beverly Hills, California
If you want to end your co-ownership relationship, but your co-owner disagrees, a partition action is your only option. Our experienced partition lawyers serving Beverly Hills have years of experience ending co-ownership disputes in California and can help you unlock the equity in your Los Angeles County property. For a free, 15-minute consultation with a knowledgeable partition attorney at Partition Lawyer California, call (310) 496-3300 or fill out a contact form online.
Contact us Today for a Free Consultation with a Partition Attorney in Beverly Hills, California
Our partition attorneys in Beverly Hills also serve West Hollywood, Bel Air, Brentwood, Santa Monica, Culver City, and Holmby Hills
